Portal to the Online Railway Photos of Canadian Archives
GTR Victoria Tubular Bridge

Introduction

On several occasions in our youth, we experienced traversing the Victoria Jubilee Bridge, the in situ successor to the Victoria Tubular Bridge. The nearly one and three-quarter mile journeys across the St. Lawrence River remain lasting memories.

The construction of the original bridge was an unquestionable engineering feat. Its completion must have given Montrealers and fellow colonists great pride. And it may well have been another impetus towards nationhood as the signing of the British North American Act, making Canada a self-governing federation, would occur seven years later.

Details about the construction were documented by the on-site engineer. His book has provided invaluable insights for many historians. Below then are extracts from various publications describing the pertinent facts and events, each one adding different details that flesh out the whole story.

Literature

Legget, p. 44: «And the St Lawrence was bridged at Montreal with the great Victoria tubular bridge, designed by Robert Stephenson. Even today this structure ranks among the great railroad bridges of North America. It is 9,144 ft between abutments, its original tubular superstructure being 6,592 ft long. The original piers are still in use but now carry a modern steel truss superstructure. … With the opening of the bridge, a continuous rail connection was provided from the Atlantic seaboard at Portland to the US boundary at Sarnia.»

Protheroe, pp. 666 & 668: «… the St. Lawrence is crossed by the Victoria Jubilee Bridge, which replaced the old Victoria tubular bridge erected by the Grand Trunk Company in 1860. It is one of the longest bridges in the world, being nearly two miles in length, including approaches. George [sic; Robert] Stephenson was the consulting engineer of the original structure, and he approved the plans of Alexander M. Ross in spite of numerous professional critics, who declared that the piers would collapse under the pressure of the first winter ice-pack. The bridge was a rectangular tube 6592-ft. long by 16-ft. wide and 18-ft. high; weight, 9044 tons; cost, £1,300,000. Stephenson did not live to see the completion of the great work, which defied the St. Lawrence current running at 7 miles an hour and the spring ice floes for three-quarters of a century, until the single track could no longer cope with the enormously increased traffic. It was decided to cut away the old bridge span by span to give place to an open steel truss bridge, weighing 23,000 tons, nearly 70-ft. wide, carrying not only a double railway track, but a roadway for an electric tramline, with space for vehicular traffic and a footway for pedestrians.»

MacKay and Perry, pp. 14 & 17: «The Grand Trunk had 206 locomotives in 1860 and its shops at Point St. Charles, Montreal, where rolling stock was repaired and built, became a city of steam covering thirty acres, with foundries, rolling mills and 2,500 boilermakers, machinists, electricians, pipefitters, carpenters, moulders and other artisans. The first engine built there was the Trevithick to pull the royal train of the Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII, in 1860. Though only thirty-three tons, it was the giant of its day. For the occasion, the Grand Trunk built Canada's first fancy parlour car, with air conditioning provided by blocks of ice.

The highlight of the prince's visit was the opening of Montreal's Victoria Bridge (also built by Robert Stephenson), which the prince said was “unsurpassed by the grandeur of Egypt or Rome.” Its tubular spans, supported by piers of limestone, arched across the St. Lawrence River to assure Montreal's primacy as the country's commercial capital for another hundred years.»

Stevens, pp. 50 & 52-53: «At Montreal further progress could be observed, for while the traveler to Quebec City still crossed the St. Lawrence in a small ferry, the great piers of Victoria Bridge continued to grow out of the bed of the river in serried order. From beginning to end, this project was a professional job that revealed that Peto, Brassey, Jackson and Betts, whatever their deficiencies as promoters, were worthy of their reputation as master builders. Many engineers held it to be lunacy to attempt to build a bridge more that two miles in length, at a height under which ocean steamships might pass, across a mighty stream given to heavy floods and violent ice jams. However, two eminent Canadian engineers, Casimir Gzowski and Thomas Coltrin Keefer, said that it could be done, and Robert Stephenson, whose father had built the first locomotive, designed another of his famous tubular structures. Peto, Brassey, Jackson and Betts fabricated it in their ironworks at Birkenhead with such accuracy that out of 1,540,000 rivet holes not one needed reaming or redrilling. Best of all, they got James Hodges, a brillant engineer, to erect the bridge. At the completion of his task, he wrote a dramatic narrative, illustrated by his own drawings. Neither in Canada nor anywhere else has a great feat of engineering been carried out more efficiently or been more amply documented.

Hodges was accompanied by several hundred craftsmen — finishing masons, master carpenters, blacksmiths and other specialists. They suffered greatly from the extremes of climate — frostbite and snow blindness in the winter, sunstroke in the fierce heat of midsummer. There was also an outbreak of the dreaded ship fever (the colloquial name for cholera). Yet these skilled workers stuck to their tasks manfully and quickly learned the ways of the country. …

A local attitude that caused him considerable trouble was the unwillingness of Canadian workmen to accept long-term contracts. …

Such difficulties, however, both with imported craftsmen and local labor were no more than learning pains. The British craftsmen quickly adopted colonial practices, and the Canadians soon took pride in pulling in harness with their fellows. Throughout the five years it took to build the bridge, Hodges again and again reported instances in which the colonists and the home countrymen pooled their knowledge to common advantage. A typical instance was a primitive traveler, the ancestor of the rail-layers of the future. It moved along 1,300 feet of temporary tracks laid on gantrys; its sixty-foot boom hoisted the ten-ton blocks of stone from the river barges, stacked them and later conveyed them to the sites of the piers or retaining walls. Such a machine had been shipped out from England, but had proved useless and had been thrown aside. A subcontractor named Chaffey, described by Hodges as “an Englishman who had been in Canada sufficiently long to free his genius from the shackles riveted on him in early life,” undertook its reconstruction. Thereafter it worked perfectly.

The piers had been designed with sharp cutwaters, as protection against the ice, and with substantial cribwork around them because of possible damage during the summer months from the great rafts of logs that it was impossible to steer between them. The first caisson was towed into position on the Queen's Birthday, May 24, 1854. The first pier took several months to build, but improved teamwork progressively reduced the period until the last pier was completed in forty-five days. In August 1857, the assembly of the superstructure began. It consisted of twenty-five tubular spans sixteen feet in width and eighteen feet in height; the sides were plate girder and the roofs were of timber with tin sheeting. The tubes were erected in pairs and were connected with expansion joints mounted on rollers. The total length of the tubular portion was 6,521 feet; of the entire bridge, 10,410 feet.

On December 15, 1859, the first train crossed; the contractors not only had kept within their time estimate but they had also delivered the bridge for $500,000 less than its estimated cost. On August 25, 1860, H. R. H. the Prince of Wales, the first member of the Royal Family to undertake an officiual tour of Canada, had driven the last rivet.»

Two days after the first train crossed, it was time to celebrate the accomplishment in an appropriate fashion:






Reference

  1. Hodges. J. (1860), Construction of the Great Victoria Bridge in Canada, J. Weale, London.
  2. Legget, R.F. (1973), Railways of Canada, Douglas & McIntyre, Vancouver, B.C..
  3. MacKay, D. and Perry, L. (1994), Train Country: An Illustrated History of Canadian National Railways, Douglas & McIntyre, Vancouver/Toronto, Canada, ISBN 1-55054-153-6.
  4. Protheroe, E. (1914), The Railways of the World, George Routledge & Sons, Ltd., London, UK.
  5. Stevens, G.R. (1973), History of the Canadian National Railways, The Macmillan Company, New York.
  6. The Canadian Encyclopedia (2020), The Constitution Act, 1867.

Last Updated December 12 2025, at 09:52:31 MST ⚫ Visitor #